Globalization

The answer to this question depends on who you ask.  If you ask leaders and business people of some small and many medium to large-sized companies, they are likely to tell you that globalization is great!  Why?  Because it literally gives them the world as their marketplace, where they can discover new markets for their products.   Developing countries also serves as labor pools for them to access cheap labor that enables them to save millions plus each year.  Of course, this brings some monies to our economy, but it probably works better for the developing nation whose people get all of those low paying jobs.   For them, low pay is better than no pay.

The downside of globalization is that while the rich get richer, the poor are getting poorer.  In the U.S., the jobs that are now going overseas to some developing nation are the same jobs that our poor would have taken; that puts them out of work and dependent on government handouts.   But it also negatively affects our economy in other ways.  Think for just a moment about all of the services and products that are connected to the jobs that are now going overseas; they’re also gone.  That affects jobs that may be listed at a higher level like plant supervisors or production managers.   The greatest problem with globalization and more specifically outsourcing are the people in developing nations who don’t have the protection of labor laws and safety regulations to protect them from poor working conditions and safety hazards.   This means we can expect more labor exploitation of the poor in foreign countries.

Please follow and like us:

The First Step in Building an Effective Team

The first step a leader does in building an effective team, is to rally employees around a worthwhile meaningful organizational goal. To do this, the leader uses his or her legitimate power and influence to get a costick_figures_team_puzzle_9689mmitment — sometimes called buy-in — from the members of the team to work towards certain goals.  To get this buy-in, the leader has to clearly articulate the purpose and goals for the team, establish performance standards, and make certain that the goals of the individual teams members are the same as the goals of the team.  This is an important and vital first step in building an effective team because commitment is the fuel that accomplishes goals.  The power of commitment lies in its emotional and psychological attachment and subsequent reward to employees who are committed to the same goals as the organization.

There are three components to organizational commitment: affective, continuance, and normative commitment. Affective commitment relates to the emotional attachment an employee has to the values and goals of his organization. Affective commitment is impacted by job satisfaction and the personal values of the employee.  Continuance commitment is the degree to which an employee is determined to remain with the organization.  In other words, an employee who has plans to leave the organization will not be as committed as one who sees himself as long-term.  Normative commitment is the sense of obligation.  It’s a socialized commitment that is influenced by co-workers.

Please follow and like us:

What is the Learning Organization?

Organization Synergist (OS)

Organization Synergist (OS)

Because of the Internet and advanced technologies, the way we do business — whether profit or nonprofit — has forever changed.   Instead of existing in a stable environment and applying standardized solutions to problems and challenges, change itself has now become the norm.  It is fast and unique.  Solutions must be equally fast and unique.   No longer can an organization wait for a memo to go upline to be reviewed by a hierarchical manager to solve most problems.   The client will be gone by the time the answer is returned.  This means most organizations will have to incur some type of restructuring for a faster response time.   Customers and followers expect answers to be efficient, innovative, and swift.   Survival and prosperity means staying relevant in a constantly changing environment.  To do this, everyone in the organization must become a problem solver.   Becoming a problem solver means having the ability to use one’s creativity in problem-solving, while learning in the process.   In learning organizations, great emphasis is placed on how you learn and less about data.   It’s about being able to use what you’ve learned to assist your organization in accomplishing its mission and goals.   And in this new Information Era, “learning” is called the new labor, and it must be organization-wide learning to be effective.

Diana – Helping your nonprofit transition to become!
Please follow and like us:

The New Role of Managers in 21st-Century Organizations

Organization Synergist (OS)

There is a logical reason that the role of manager in modern organizations is changing from one of superior, to one more along the lines of coach, mentor, or team leader.   Because of the intense competition as a result of globalization and the Internet, and the rapid and constant changes that organizations face today primarily because of advanced technologies, the survival and success of any organization today depends upon maximizing the potential of every employee.  In short, that means empowering every employee at every level of the organization to be a problem solver and a decision-maker.

Empowerment is the process of sharing vision and allowing employees to make more decisions about their own work, and allowing them to accept responsibility for those decisions.  The rationale is that by giving employees more responsibility and getting them involved and engaged with the overall vision of the organization, they will be more committed and thereby more productive.   This new culture of 21st-Century organizations is built upon the premiss of the empowerment of the individual.   It is achieved by integrating the individual’s goals with those of the organization, and by showing the employee how his or her role in the organization fits into the big picture.   People who know their value are more innovative and creative.  And those are the new skill sets that organizations are looking for today.  They are looking for life-long learners who are able to solve problems creatively and just in time.  These are the types of people who will be sought after and retained.  Welcome to the 21st-Century organization.

Please follow and like us:

Jeff Immelt Gives Three Key Words for Leaders Today

Organization Synergist (OS)

Saw an interesting video today from the Dreamforce 2012 conference where GE CEO Jeffrey Immelt was one of the keynote speakers.  From a 21st-Century leadership perspective, Immelt is called the, pinnacle of leadership today. To watch him, he really fits the bill of leaders today as opposed to yesterday’s more bureaucratic leaders.  In other words, he doesn’t come across as being a super-genious, though he does have an MBA, and we know he’s got to be a pretty savvy guy.  But he presents like what we probably expect a 21st-Century leader to look like, someone who can not only relate to “regular” people, but despite his accomplishments, has somehow managed to remain a regular guy.  Whether true or not, it’s the ability to create that perception that is important.  This is probably the primary reason Barak Obama got back into office.   Because he acts like one of us, people assume that he empathizes with us even though his policies say otherwise.  The public has genuinely accepted flawed leadership and no longer expect the same standards they once did.  Please note my distinction that this is from the liberal public perspective, not the business world.   My point?  Perception is important.   Immelt sounds quite genuine.

The commentator asked Immelt to comment on what he thought were the most important aspects for leaders today.  His answer was rather succinct and consisted of three words.  When asked the question, I braced myself to focus and listen intently, expecting a really complexed and intellectual response that I didn’t want to miss.   I assumed I would have to focus like a laser beam.  I physically relaxed when he said it was three words.   So what were his three words?  Not at all what I had expected to come from the pinnacle of leadership today.  I personally expected brilliant and very experienced to have been included; but not so.  His three words were openness, authenticity, and unity.   Surprised?  I was.

 Immelt explained how social media has changed the expectations that people have for their leaders today.   In other words, people want leaders to be open and transparent.  They don’t care that leaders are not the smartest people among the group.  Why?  Because everybody is a leader today, especially in learning organizations where success is defined by developing organizations by developing its people.    This increased value of human capital has changed, at least from the public’s perspective, what they expect from their leaders.   His second word was authenticity, in the sense that people today are looking for genuineness in their leaders.   The status quo is no longer working.   People are no longer buying the lie that their leaders are little gods.   The good part is that people don’t really care, especially as they begin to focus on their own unique abilities.   His third word was unity, and how everyone wants to belong to something.  Today’s leaders must understand that people expect leaders to open doors and create new opportunities for them as opposed to themselves.

Please follow and like us:

The Learning Dynamics of Learning Organizations

AIM PHOTO

Diana D Williams, Leadership Specialist

The dynamics of learning organizations center around its core subsystem, learning.  To understand the concept of the learning dynamics of a learning organization begins with an understanding of what learning is, especially as distinguished from  acquiring of knowledge.   Learning is a proactive activity that is planned.  It occurs when we decide we want to learn.  It is reflective in that it requires us to think about the knowledge we have acquired from experiences, observation, or documentation.   The most distinguishing factor about learning is that it is creative.  When learning takes place, it enables you to do something you were unable to do prior to the learning; which means that learning is a cyclical process that changes based upon the type of learning that is taking place.

The three subsystems that encircle learning are:  learning levels, learning types, and learning skills.  In order for genuine organizational learning to take place, and for the organization to become smarter as a result of that learning, each subsystem must be fully operational and functioning (Marquardt, 2011).

Learning must occur at three levels within the learning organization, beginning with the individual level, to the group level, and finally the organizational level.  It begins at the individual level because organizations themselves are comprised primarily of individuals who must begin the learning process.  At this level of learning, key elements are the individual’s commitment and ability to learn.  Commitment takes place at the personal level.  Ability to learn involves available opportunities to learn, and personal learning skill and potential.

The second level of learning is group learning, which is extremely important for learning organizations who function and accomplish organizational goals as self-directed teams.  The teams are comprised of committed self-directed learners, who now bring their commitment to learning as a group, which includes learning to collaborate what they have learned with others, as well as learning collectively from others in the group.  Learning collaboratively and collectively releases creativity as learners reflect off of one another, and increases group effectiveness as suggestions of possible solutions are jointly evaluated.  The goals of group learning should be aligned with organizational goals to increase synergy within the team or group (Marquardt, 2011).

Organizational learning occurs through the sharing of experiential learning among employees at all levels, and the strategic application and documentation of the results of those experiences, which become organizational policies, strategies, and procedures.  The effectiveness of organizational learning is directly related to the effectiveness of individual and group learning.

The three types of learning are adaptive, anticipatory, and action learning.  Adaptive learning begins with an action that produces a result, which is reflected upon.  The learner adapts his or her actions in order to produce a more desirable outcome.  Anticipatory learning begins with a desired outcome, and moves to reflection on how to accomplish that outcome, and ends with an action.  Action learning begins with real and specific problems, which are evaluated based upon the reflection of available knowledge to produce the best solutions, which is implemented and assessed during and after implementation (Marquardt, 2011).

The third major learning dynamic of learning organizations are five specific skills that enhance the learning capacities of individuals and thus the organization as a whole.  These skills are: systems thinking, mental models, personal mastery, self-directed learning, and dialogue (Marquardt, 2011).

Systems thinking is a skill that enables individuals to visualize and understand the interconnectedness of phenomena.  This value of this skill is to see a clear picture of the problem to be solved, which increases the effectiveness of problem solving.  Mental models are the pictures that people have at both the conscious and unconscious levels about elements of life.  These pictures are developed from experiences and culture, and are powerful because they affect behavior, even though they may be inaccurate and contrary to reality.  Individuals must become aware of the mental models they possess, and be willing to change them when necessary, so that they align with reality.  Personal mastery is a personal commitment to continually learn and improve, to benefit self and organization.  Self-directed learning is accepting responsibility for our own learning.  It doesn’t mean we will not need help, but we acknowledge our responsibility to seek and get the help we need.  Dialogue is effective communication.  It means listening to learn and understand, as well as learning to express one’s own ideas to assist in the collective learning process which is at the core of organizational learning.

Marquardt, M.J.  (2011).  Building the learning organization.  Nicholas Brealey Publishing.  Boston, MA.

//

Please follow and like us:

Globalization: Good or Bad?

AIM PHOTO

Diana D Williams
Christian Leadership Coach (CLC)

The answer to this question depends on who you ask.  If you ask leaders and business people of some small and many medium to large-sized companies, they are likely to tell you that globalization is great!  Why?  Because it literally gives them the world as their marketplace, where they can discover new markets for their products.   Developing countries also serves as labor pools for them to access cheap labor that enables them to save millions plus each year.  Of course, this brings some monies to our economy, but it probably works better for the developing nation whose people get all of those low paying jobs.   For them, low pay is better than no pay.

The downside of globalization is that while the rich get richer, the poor are getting poorer.  In the U.S., the jobs that are now going overseas to some developing nation are the same jobs that our poor would have taken; that puts them out of work and dependent on government handouts.   But it also negatively affects our economy in other ways.  Think for just a moment about all of the services and products that are connected to the jobs that are now going overseas; they’re also gone.  That affects jobs that may be listed at a higher level like plant supervisors or production managers.   The greatest problem with globalization and more specifically outsourcing are the people in developing nations who don’t have the protection of labor laws and safety regulations to protect them from poor working conditions and safety hazards.   This means we can expect more labor exploitation of the poor in foreign countries.

//

Please follow and like us:

The Impact of the Internet on Business

Speed Image

Advanced technologies and the Internet have forever changed many of the fundamental ways that we as a society do business.   The availability of instant information has removed the element of time from the business process.   Information is what business leaders use to make major decisions.   Access to instant information means that their decisions are being made at record speed, with time no longer being a part of the equation.   Change is the product of decision.  With instant decisions also comes instant change.

Business competition has been exponentially increased as a result of the Internet and online marketing.  Now small vendors can reach markets in other countries, just like their larger counterparts.   Basically, understanding the needs and psychology of your market and how to reach them online has become more relevant to sales success than having a large marketing budget.   This has dramatically narrowed the competitive edge that many medium-sized firms  have had over smaller firms.  Smaller firms are now very capably competing for the very same markets.

The Internet has also created a interconnected global community.   The economy of our nation is intertwined with the economies of those with whom we whom we do business across the seas.   Just as the United States owns and operates businesses in foreign countries, those same foreign countries own and operate businesses right here in the U.S.  The impact of this interconnectedness means that as a nation, we must be concerned to some degree about economic conditions overseas.  It means that by necessity, we do business with nations with whom we may politically disagree.   This is the nature of a global economy.

//

Please follow and like us: